nanog mailing list archives

Re: [Backbone Infrastructure and Secrecy]


From: Chris Kilbourn <kilbo-list () forest net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 21:48:49 -0700


At 5:57 PM -0400 7/8/03, Adam Kujawski wrote:
I like the idea of a clearinghouse where one can access the data
after a background check and a NDA.

Except for the fact that it expensive and time consuming to do background checks. The FBI is still chewing through a backlog of thousands of post-9/11 checks that need to be done.

Classifying the data also raises questions of:

A) who will pay for the checks?
B) what are the criteria for being granted clearance?
C) how can the information be compartmentalized to prevent unintended disclosure to those not authorized to view the data?
D) what threat/s is/are reduced by classifying the data?
E) will the data be more or less reliable after classification?
F) what legislation will be required to ensure that new data is classified upon creation?

Will backhoe operators need to have background checks if they're trenching for new fiber runs?

There's too much hair here to make it practical, IMHO.
--
Regards,

Chris Kilbourn
Founder
_________________________________________________________________
digital.forest                             Int'l: +1-425-483-0483
where Internet solutions grow               http://www.forest.net


Current thread: