nanog mailing list archives

Re: OT: Re: User negligence?


From: Len Rose <len () netsys com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 01:37:24 -0400


Hi Sean,

I seem to have misunderstood you.. I assumed you were speaking
about an internal system (in the bank itself) I didn't read
the article you posted and without that I suppose I was in
the wrong context. Maybe.


Sean Donelan wrote:

{zap]

It a breach of security of the *USER'S* computer, not the *BANK'S*
computers.

See above.

How many people do you know have a full-time systems staff mainaining
their home PCs? 

See above.

If they are lucky, they might have a clever teenager in the house which
helps their parents set the clock on the VCR and unpack the PC they bought
at Best Buy.  If they aren't lucky, it was probably the same clever
teenager that downloaded the trojaned software on the parent's PC.
Is the Bank or ISP supposed to send suppport staff to each customer's
house to maintain host level security on customer's home PCs?  The bank
didn't sell the customer the computer or the Microsoft software, didn't
install software on the home PC, and doesn't maintain the home PC.

See above.

Outlook, the exploding Pinto on the information superhighway.

Microsoft, Who wants to get owned today?

Len

PS Susan, I swear I won't do this again, please don't yell at me.


Current thread: