nanog mailing list archives
Re: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 06:43:08 -0500
Andy Dills wrote:
Yes, but the original poster was dealing with DS3s connected to different NAPs, which is why the packet out-of-order issue can be significant.
I'd say that a more significant issue is customer throughput. The nice aspect of per conn is that it not only tends to keep a decent load balance, it also limits bandwidth hogs from saturating all circuits. This of course depends on your desired result. An example in my case is my helpdesk. They are off two t1's with dsl and dialup customers. I'd prefer them not to tank both t1's when transfering files to and from the core servers.
-Jack
Current thread:
- RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Vandy Hamidi (Jul 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Vandy Hamidi (Jul 02)
- RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Andy Dills (Jul 02)
- Re: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Jack Bates (Jul 03)
- RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Andy Dills (Jul 02)
- RE: Newbie network upgrade question, apologies in advance to NANOG Ejay Hire (Jul 03)