nanog mailing list archives
Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:37:35 +0100 (BST)
I don't think it will ever truly go away.. there are lots of "older" routers that won't be able to support the newer code, albeit small routers like the 2500's, but they'll exist..
Yes I have some old routers (2500s) for which no code exists which is patched and small enough to sit in the flash/memory... acl acl ! Steve
Current thread:
- Patching for Cisco vulnerability Irwin Lazar (Jul 18)
- RE: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Bob German (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Jared Mauch (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Daniel Roesen (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Jared Mauch (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Daniel Roesen (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Larry Rosenman (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Petri Helenius (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Daniel Roesen (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 18)
- Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Petri Helenius (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Niels Bakker (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Curtis Maurand (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Jared Mauch (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Niels Bakker (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Niels Bakker (Jul 18)
- Re: Infrastructure Filtering (was Re: Patching for Cisco vulnerability) Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 18)