nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fixed IOS datestamps?
From: Jim Duncan <jnduncan () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:31:39 -0400
Scott Call writes:
I started collecting the new IOS files for tonight's reboot of the Internet, and I had a quick question. The datestamps on a lot of the maintainence releases are months old, and I just want to make sure I'm getting the right stuff, as they say, so we don't have to do this dance again tomorrow. For example, 12.0S users are recommended to go to 12.0(25)S, which at least for the GSR is dated April 14, 2003. Do I have the right build of 12.0(25)S or will there be one with a date closer to the revelation of the exploit showing up on the cisco FTP site?
I just checked the source code. 12.0(25)S does indeed have the fix. Jim == Jim Duncan, Critical Infrastructure Assurance Group, Cisco Systems, Inc. jnduncan () cisco com, +1 919 392 6209, http://www.cisco.com/go/ciag/. PGP: DSS 4096/1024 E09E EA55 DA28 1399 75EB D6A2 7092 9A9C 6DC3 1821
Current thread:
- Fixed IOS datestamps? Scott Call (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jack Bates (Jul 17)
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Matthew Kaufman (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jim Duncan (Jul 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Steve Rude (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Niels Bakker (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jared Mauch (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jim Duncan (Jul 17)
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Steve Rude (Jul 17)