nanog mailing list archives

Re: W32.SqlSlammer

From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 15:58:07 -0500 (EST)


On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Drew Weaver wrote:

By the way, I know you guys probably don't care but McAfee is saying that if
you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with
SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS
infected.


SP3 for W2K or SP3 for SQL Server?  They are two different things...

C

-Drew

Current thread:

W32.SqlSlammer Drew Weaver (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer K. Scott Bethke (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Dave Stewart (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Avleen Vig (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Simon Lockhart (Jan 25)
- RE: W32.SqlSlammer andrew2 (Jan 25)
  - RE: W32.SqlSlammer Alex Rubenstein (Jan 25)
- Re: W32.SqlSlammer Charles Sprickman (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: W32.SqlSlammer Bender, Andrew (Jan 25)