nanog mailing list archives
Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty
From: Avi Freedman <freedman () freedman net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:04:11 -0500
In article <103014.212147.2001 () avi netaxs com> Mr. Maddaus wrote: : This may be true on the services side of the business but the hw/sw : manufacturing side that provisions the service side has seen fit in years : past to ignore small issues. It is just too costly to develop and support : with limited R&D resources in financially sparse times. For example, the : major telecom manufacturers (i.e. Lucent,Nortel...) do customize code and : equipment for the major telcos, but only when the proverbial "mega-deal" is : signed and booked. : regards Avi, : Maddaus Agreed on the hardware side, certainly... But network providers are only very recently getting good at prioritizing "it must work and pass packets without crashing" vs. "it needs the features to let me network scale, provide multi-application support, etc etc etc ". It sounds like AOL is voting with their $ there, so at least that's a good sign. Regards, John... Avi
Current thread:
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty, (continued)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Vijay Gill (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Avi Freedman (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jan 15)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecurity Avi Freedman (Jan 15)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecurity Daniel Senie (Jan 15)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecurity Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jan 17)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jan 15)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty sgorman1 (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty batz (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Avi Freedman (Jan 14)
- RE: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Merlin Communications (Jan 14)
- Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty Avi Freedman (Jan 14)