nanog mailing list archives

Re: US-Asia Peering


From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 13 Jan 2003 07:58:20 +0000


kurtis () kurtis pp se (Kurt Erik Lindqvist) writes:

      Bill,

How do you see the failed AMS-IX expansion fit into this?

My (very simplified) summary of what happened was that :
...
At the time of the origin of the discussion I was peering co-ordinator at
KPNQwest, and would have pulled-out of AMS-IX if the plans (and KQ..:) )
would have moved on.

well of course i'm not bill, but (naturally) i will comment anyway.  was
AMS-IX planning to expand beyond its original metro and bridge all the XP
switches together?  if so then i understand exactly why KQ and other ISP's
would have pulled out of AMS-IX in protest (and in fear).  however, if the
expansion was intra-metro, then i must be confused, because KQ's major
source of bandwidth revenue should have been inter-metro not intra-metro.
-- 
Paul Vixie


Current thread: