nanog mailing list archives

OT: Banc of America Article


From: "Al Rowland" <alan_r1 () corp earthlink net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:21:15 -0800


I believe specific account data is not kept on the local machine. I may
be wrong, not to mention the data strip on the card...

Nothing new. Look at what happened to the Chicago Board of Trade a few
years back. I wonder how WCOM reported the out-of-court settlement for
that one their books. ;0

The original NSI SI,
National-Security-Internet-(Survivable-Infrastructure), model was
replaced years ago by the BBC, Best-Business-Case model, puns intended.

Best regards,
______________________________
Al Rowland


-----Original Message-----
From: alex () yuriev com [mailto:alex () yuriev com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Al Rowland
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: Banc of America Article


IIRC, the ATM system is similar to CC transactions. A best 
effort is 
made to authorize against your account (Credit Card or 
Banking) but if 
it fails and the transaction is within a normal range (your 
daily card
limit) the CC/ATM completes the transaction.

      Too bad it is not the case, but lets presume that it 
is. How does it explain branches not being able to process 
direct withdrawals either?

      The incident on hand illustrates that the design of our 
financial networks is broken. If a non sophisticated worm 
managed to create so many problems, what is going to happen 
should a real attack be mounted against the networks used by 
financial services?

Alex




Current thread: