nanog mailing list archives
Re: ebgp-multihop
From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:45:31 -0600
From: Tim Rand Hi - I have searched the archives but have not found an answer to my question - is there any danger in using excessively high TTL values with ebgp-multihop? For example, neighbor x.x.x.x ebgp-multihop 255 - 255 is generally much higher than needed, but is there any risk/danger ?? Thanks in advance. - Tim The number of hops in an ebgp-multihop scenario isn't usually the concern. When using ebgp sessions to null route baddies, the peer can be an unspecified number of hops away. I would consider 255 to be overkill, but not much harm. In normal routing, I would try to keep the hop count within 1 or 2. It's just a good practice. Remember, every router between the two sessions has to also know the route. Perhaps some of the older folks have some better tidbits of advice. -Jack
Current thread:
- ebgp-multihop Tim Rand (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop David Barak (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop Jared Mauch (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop alex (Feb 28)
- Re: ebgp-multihop David Barak (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop Steve Carter (Feb 27)
- Re: ebgp-multihop Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ebgp-multihop Stewart, William C (Bill), SALES (Feb 28)
- Re: ebgp-multihop Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)