nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ?
From: "K. Scott Bethke" <kbethke () thruport com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:10:59 -0500
Same here on packet loss.. I see issues @level3 in Amsterdam, and this is going out a tranist link from Qwest. # ping peach.ripe.net PING peach.ripe.net (193.0.0.203): 56 octets data 64 octets from 193.0.0.203: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=86.2 ms 64 octets from 193.0.0.203: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=86.1 ms 64 octets from 193.0.0.203: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=86.2 ms 64 octets from 193.0.0.203: icmp_seq=6 ttl=241 time=86.4 ms --- peach.ripe.net ping statistics --- 9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 86.1/86.2/86.4 ms ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme () multicasttech com> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: RIPE Down or DOSed ?
Can anyone else get to ripe.net ? I cannot seem to access the whois or any other service (my ripe traffic goes through Sprint). When I ping peach.ripe.net, I get 90%+ missing packets + "destination host unreachable" from inside Sprint. Regards Marshall Eubanks
Current thread:
- RIPE Down or DOSed ? Marshall Eubanks (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? K. Scott Bethke (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? hostmaster (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? hostmaster (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? kai (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Will Yardley (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Dave Israel (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Kai Schlichting (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? jlewis (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? Kai Schlichting (Feb 28)
- anti-spam vs network abuse jlewis (Feb 27)
- Re: anti-spam vs network abuse Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- Re: RIPE Down or DOSed ? hostmaster (Feb 27)