nanog mailing list archives

Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not?

From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:13:16 -0700 (MST)


On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that any software
Computer Associates publishes is designed for the
criminally insane.


http://www.sltrib.com/2003/feb/02232003/business/31810.asp

Current thread:

Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Christopher J. Wolff (Feb 25)
- Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Martin hepworth (Feb 26)
- Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 26)
  - Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Pete Kruckenberg (Feb 26)
    - Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 26)
    - Re[2]: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Richard Welty (Feb 26)
    - Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Petri Helenius (Feb 26)
- Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Pete Kruckenberg (Feb 26)
  - Re[2]: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Richard Welty (Feb 26)
- Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Christopher McCrory (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Jeff Weisberg (Feb 26)
  - Re: Network monitoring/IDS rant - What's hot what's not? Jared Mauch (Feb 26)