nanog mailing list archives
Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () darkuncle net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:49:15 -0800
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0000, DaveHowe () gmx co uk said: [snip]
So they meant they got IDS "hits" hours before anyone posted a full description of the attacks to bugtraq when they said they had detected the worm hours before it spread? That's a novel use of english :)
One typically finds little else in marketing. :) -- Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net illum oportet crescere me autem minui
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before, (continued)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Martin Hannigan (Feb 13)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Krzysztof Adamski (Feb 13)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Etaoin Shrdlu (Feb 13)
- The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Mike Lewinski (Feb 15)
- Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Peter Salus (Feb 15)
- Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) William Warren (Feb 15)
- The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Martin Hannigan (Feb 13)
- RE: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Terry Baranski (Feb 23)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Glen Fillmore (Feb 24)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before David Howe (Feb 24)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Scott Francis (Feb 25)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Glen Fillmore (Feb 24)