Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders

[Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>]

Alexander Bochmann  writes on 12/2/2003 2:05 PM:

> If some of the large Email providers like Outblaze, 
> Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, etc. could agree on a more 
> integrated approach to implement at least some form 
> of sender authorization - possibly in the line of the 
> RMX RR draft[1] - as a service to the public, the 
> aggressive MX callbacks would perhaps be made 
> redundant... 

There are just too many RMX proposals around.

Once some of them get consolidated, it will be a good idea to adopt the 
best and most popularly accepted one.

At least now that ASRG has some good new leadership with John Levine 
stepping in as co-chair (Yakov has always been doing a great job) I hope 
things move forward :)

By the way there will be a panel on the different proposals during the 
conference track on spam that we at apcauce.org are organizing at 
APRICOT 2004 (www.apricot2004.net).  Speakers include Dave Crocker and 
Meng Weng Wong (the originator of spf)

        srs

--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations