nanog mailing list archives

Re: a note to those who would automate their rejection notices


From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:34:30 -0500


On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 07:06:30PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:

of the foundational principles which made the internet possible and which
made it different from alternatives such as OSI, very few remain.  one of
them was "must scale indefinitely".  a simple application of this principle
toward anti-virus and anti-spam automated rejection notices is to ignore
the envelope and ignore the header and just focus on the peer IP address:

   To: postmaster@[212.202.52.233]

would have been a better destination for this.  it's standards-compliant,
and if the sender isn't an open proxy then they'll be able to get it, and
it will not needlessly increase the collateral damage toward the holders
of domains that were forged.

Isn't the use of capital letters at the beginning of sentences
standards-compliant with English? :)

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)


Current thread: