nanog mailing list archives

Re: Root Authority


From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:00:47 +0100


On 16.12 07:14, Paul Vixie wrote:
we (i'm speaking for f-root here) have no "authority".  nobody has to
listen to us, we are the most powerless bunch of folks you'll ever meet.

now if you'd asked where we derive our *relevance*, i'd say the same as
mr. bush and mr. kletnieks -- from all the root.cache files that point
at us.  and as long as we don't do anything stupid i guess (and hope)
that this state of affairs will continue.  (relevance trumps authority.)

that having been said, f-root got its start as NS.ISC.ORG and the man
who said it was ok for us to be a root name server was jon postel.  i'm
not sure he had any "authority" either, but folks "pointed at" him and
so what he said was relevant in spite of any authority he mightn've had.

Amen!

This also holds for k-root and is so well put that I will not paraphrase it
just for the sake of putting it differently.  It is worth reading again!

Daniel


Current thread: