nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
From: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell () martin fl us>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:39:52 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote: [snip]
Peering relationships work for BGP (lots of rules) and they worked for USENET (not many rules). Why can't the same principles be applied to email or IM services?
Where is NickC when you need him... this sounds like something out of his layer4 nap idea... Seriously, do we really need SMTP peering agreements? I don't know of too many places that are UUCPing their email... SMTP traffic already crosses (BGP) peering agreement controlled links. If putting contractional obligations there fails to work why should we believe some new and less understood system would be any more effective?
Current thread:
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?, (continued)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? just me (Dec 07)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 04)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Michael . Dillon (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Petri Helenius (Dec 03)
- RE: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Tony Hain (Dec 04)
- And your solution is? (was RE: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?) Sean Donelan (Dec 04)
- RE: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Jeffrey Paul (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Dave Howe (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Michael . Dillon (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Greg Maxwell (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 03)
- Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ? Michael . Dillon (Dec 03)