RE: microsoft.com

[up () 3 am]

Yeah:

 7  sl-gw29-nyc-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.13.16)  8.728 ms  8.674 ms
 8  sl-ft-10-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.171.90)  12.338 ms  11.911 ms
 9  P13-0.NYKCR2.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.30)  37.556 ms
10  P2-0.NYKBB5.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.230)  12.385 ms
11  81.52.249.16 (81.52.249.16)  13.164 ms  19.364 ms  12.446 ms

Interestingly, there's no reverse dns for 81.52.249.16 and it shows as
being RIPE space...allocated to Akamai...do you suppose this is to
minimize embarassment to MS that they would have to use Akamai?

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Huopio Kauto wrote:

> It seems that Microsoft is Akamai'zing as we speak..
>
> --Kauto
>
> Kauto Huopio - kauto.huopio () ficora fi
> Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
> Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
> tel. +358-9-6966772, fax. +358-9-6966515
> CERT-FI duty desk +358-9-6966510 / http://www.cert.fi
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Heitman [mailto:bryan () bryanheitman com]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:48 AM
> To: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: microsoft.com
>
>
>
> Several networks I have talked to are reporting they can't get to
> www.microsoft.com
>
> Has the virus began?  anyone?
>
>
> Bryan

James Smallacombe                     PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up () 3 am                                                          http://3.am
=========================================================================