nanog mailing list archives

RE: RPC errors


From: "Bob German" <bobgerman () irides com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:00:37 -0400



I've seen similar behavior.  I patch immediately and religiously, and on
two of my patched boxes I've seen unusual svchost crashes yesterday and
today.  But no infection, knock on wood.

Bob German
Sr Systems Engineer
Irides, LLC



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
John Dvorak
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:57 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: RPC errors



On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:33:33 -0400
 Kevin Houle <kjh () cert org> wrote:

--On Monday, August 11, 2003 02:26:40 PM -0700 Mike Damm 
<MikeD () irwinresearch com> wrote:

The DCOM exploit that is floating around crashes the Windows RPC 
service when the attacker closes the connection to your system after 
a successful attack. Best bet is to assume any occurrence of crashing

RPC services to be signs of a compromised system until proven 
otherwise.

http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-19.html

That's good advice. Many of the known exploits cause the RPC service 
to crash after the exploit is successful. I'll point out that not all 
exploits cause the service failure. So, the absence of an RPC service 
failure is likewise not an indicator that a vulnerable machine has 
escaped compromise.

Kevin

Interestingly, we have clear examples of boxes which were not infected
but on which RPC services did crash.  This may suggest that the worm
also takes advantage of the unrelated RPC DOS vulnerability (2000 and
XP) which I believe MS has still not patched.

John



Current thread: