nanog mailing list archives

Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic

From: Omachonu Ogali <nanog () missnglnk com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:59:30 -0400


Oops, didn't fully understand the post before I hit reply.

Ignore that little rant.

Current thread:

Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Raymond, Steven (Aug 27)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 27)
  - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 27)
    - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
    - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 28)
    - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
    - Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic bdragon (Aug 31)
    - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 31)
    - Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Omachonu Ogali (Aug 31)
    - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 31)
    - Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Omachonu Ogali (Aug 31)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Keptin Komrade Dr. BobWrench III esq. (Aug 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic JC Dill (Aug 29)
  - RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 29)