nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fun new policy at AOL
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:25:05 -0400
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:00:29 EDT, Matthew Crocker said:
How does this sound for a new mail distribution network.
Only a few problem here: 1) Bootstrapping it - as long as you need to accept legacy SMTP because less than 90% of the mail is being done the new way, you have a hard sell in getting anybody to go to the effort of buying in. 2) Feel free in working out arrangements with 4,000 other ISPs, or getting stuck with a provider. You thought it sucked trying to get a route announced for multihoming, this is going to be a lot worse. 3) Go read up on why ADMD/PRMD sucked in X.400 (hint - see (2)).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Joel Jaeggli (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL David Lesher (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Richard D G Cox (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Joseph McDonald (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Bruce Pinsky (Aug 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Petri Helenius (Aug 28)