nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:30:56 +0300
Rick Ernst wrote:
Look for one which has working abuse department which actually takes action. Example of one whichOne of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T. I also realize that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :)
doesn´t would be the likes of Cogent. Verio comes to mind. Pete
Current thread:
- Tier-1 without their own backbone? Rick Ernst (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Christopher McCrory (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Petri Helenius (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Matthew Sweet (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Leo Bicknell (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? David Diaz (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Joel Perez (Aug 27)
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Sean Crandall (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? John Palmer (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Larry Rosenman (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Will Yardley (Aug 27)
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? jlewis (Aug 27)
- GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?) variable (Aug 28)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? John Palmer (Aug 27)
(Thread continues...)