nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sobigf + BGP
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:51:48 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, guy wrote:
'vuln'dev', and besides I wouldn't think that any one here would do something malicious with any idea that actually worked for the worse.Assuming that everyone subscribed to the list has the best of intentions, what about people that can scan the publicly accessible archives? Or even the search engines that have nanog archives indexed? There's nothing wrong with kicking ideas like this around with the intention of coming up with a strategy on how to combat them, but perhaps a more discreet forum would be appropriate?
There are a lot more people subscribed to the list than you actually see posting, I'm sure many of them are representatives of the l33t h4x0r community.. My impression of most of these people is that they are very clever, and unless you post something here that is really brilliant thinking the chances are these guys can come up with most of the ideas themselves. Steve
Current thread:
- Sobigf + BGP J. Oquendo (Aug 23)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sobigf + BGP guy (Aug 23)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP bdragon (Aug 27)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Pete Kruckenberg (Aug 27)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Sounil Yu (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Adam Maloney (Aug 24)