nanog mailing list archives
Re: mobile.att.net dead
From: George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:22:16 -0700
If you are relying on AT&T's paging/SMS service (for your phones) to be alerted to (most certainly undesirable) operational events (or if you are replying to them via the 2-way SMS service), this is a good time for a backup pager: [...] Both are dead like a door stop, and we can speculate on wether they are located in the same physical building, on the same routed interface, and the same physical switch, which failed the single processor blade driving both of them.
POI: AT&T wireless service response to wireless phone trouble report about 30 min ago was that AT&T wireless and AT&T long distance stopped communicating a little while ago for reasons not clearly known to AT&T wireless. Facility somewhere go boom? Cable cut? -george william herbert gherbert () retro com
Current thread:
- mobile.att.net dead Kai Schlichting (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead jspam (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Stephen Sprunk (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead jspam (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mobile.att.net dead George William Herbert (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Scott Granados (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 29)