nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question about 223/8


From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:06:16 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 Michael.Dillon () radianz com wrote:

Imagine you have a device that uses lots of addresses but considers them 
to be sequential numbers rather than bit patterns. For instance, this 
device could be configured with a starting number and then dole out 
sequential numbers to connections based on that starting number. This is 
how a lot of terminal servers work.

Have you configured any terminal/access servers recently?

Imagine that you give the terminal server a number like 223.255.255.200 as 
the starting number to assign to dialup connections and that terminal 
server has a 32 port card installed. Then one day an engineer installs a 
second 32 port card. The terminal server continues to function just fine 
until one day when it tries to assign 223.255.255.255 to an incoming call 
followed by assigning 224.0.0.0 to the next call. Suddenly you have all 
kinds of wierdness breaking out with mysterious broadcast traffic and 
multicast traffic coming from the device. But it only happens for short 
bursts during the busiest times of the day. What the heck is going on!?

I'd call that incompetence.  A starting number of 200 + 64 ports = too
small an IP pool.  The cisco gear I use is a bit smarter and when
configuring IP pools, both the starting address and ending address are
specified (and you can specify multiple non-contiguous ranges).  I
generally omit /24 network/broadcast addresses from IP pools because too
much software assumes everything's a /24 and if you assign someone a /24
broadcast IP, they're going to receive some (maybe alot of) junk traffic
depending on what's in the other subnets of the /24 they're in.

Maybe that's why 223.255.255/24 should be forever reserved.

That's way too stupid a reason.  That better not be it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


Current thread: