nanog mailing list archives

RE: 60 Hudson


From: "Jeffrey Meltzer" <jeffrey () villageworld com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:51:06 -0400


Correct, this FiberNet is www.ftgx.com

If anyone was curious on how the story continued, this OC48 card that they
need is still, aparently, 10 days away from being delivered by Nortel. The
only thing I can figure at this point is that FiberNet is on credit hold
with Nortel or something.  In 8 years of selling & RMA'ing hardware, I've
never heard of anything this mission critical taking 10 days, it's always
overnight.  Either that, or FiberNet can't afford a new one, and is waiting
for one to pop up on ebay :)

Go Go Gadget FiberNet!

If anyone needs anything in NYC, go with KeySpan Communications, they keep
spares in stock and my stuff with them hasn't gone down once in 4 years
(knock wood). :)

JEFF

--
Jeffrey Meltzer
ICS/VillageWorld
631-218-0700 


-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:alex () nac net] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Drew Weaver
Cc: 'Jeffrey Meltzer'; 'nanog () merit edu'


FiberNet != FNSI.



On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Drew Weaver wrote:


This might explain why fiber net went out of business and 
sold to cogent??

-Drew


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Meltzer [mailto:jeffrey () villageworld com]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:32 AM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: 60 Hudson


Quick followup, apparently the current issue i'm having 
with them is a 
"bad
oc48 card" (again, shocker), and they don't have one in 
stock, and had 
to put a "rush order" in for a new one...You'd think a 
carrier would 
keep this sort of thing in stock.  Went down late yesterday 
afternoon, 
and with this being Friday, i'm sure this won't be fixed 
until late Monday.

Use this as an indicator before choosing FiberNet :)

Jeff

--
Jeffrey Meltzer
Network Services Manager
ICS/VillageNet
631.218.0700

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 09:42:22AM -0400, Jeffrey Meltzer wrote:

As someone who uses FiberNet in 60 Hudson (and ethernet 
link back to 
25
Broadway) i'd say avoid them like the plague.  In the ~6 
months that 
i've had this circuit (aparently it's provisioned over an OC48), 
it's gone down at least 4 times, possibly more, sometimes for 
upwards of 12 hours at a
time
(starts at 10% packet loss, then just keeps growing).  
Their answer 
every times has been "bad OC48 card".  I don't know 
whether that's 
just the line they're feeding me (I have a feeling it 
is), or their 
hardware vendor is just garbage, but they don't appear to 
have the 
ability to keep this
circuit
up for more than 3 weeks at a time.

At one point they sold us on upgrading it from Ethernet 
to FastE, we 
said
ok
maybe that will be better.  However, they took down the 
10M link at 
around
9pm
on a Friday night, and by 7pm Sunday night they hadn't 
had the 100M 
link
up
yet so we just told them to forget it...

Since the circuit is just backup, i've been testing 
FiberNet as fo late.
Yesterday, after I started seeing packet loss I waited at least 2 
hours to call them, to see if they'd notice the issue 
themselves.  
Of course as
usual
they didn't.

I'm fairly sure i'm the only customer they are providing this 
service to between 25B and 60H, otherwise for sure they'd know by 
know (unless they are dedicating a full OC48 to my 10M 
link, which 
would be a whole other story itself).

I'm unsure, however, if this is how they provision service inside 
(suite
to
suite) 60 Hudson, it'd be fairly strange if they did, but 
FiberNet 
is turning out to be a fairly strange company.

..just my experience :)

JEFF

--
Jeffrey Meltzer
Network Services Manager
ICS/VillageNet
631-218-0700

On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Simon Lockhart wrote:

Speaking to Level3, they're saying that the Fibernet 
suite on the 
1st
floor
is the best place for interconnects to other suites in 
the building.


-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --




Current thread: