nanog mailing list archives

RE: Low AS - Number


From: "Temkin, David" <temkin () sig com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:19:06 -0400


Unless you're AS 1 <cough> AS 3356 </cough> does it really matter? :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Kuhnke [mailto:eric () fnordsystems com] 
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 12:12 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: Low AS - Number



The US Army Aberdeen Proving Ground controls ASN 666.  Coincidence?  I think
not!

:)

At 12:10 PM 4/21/2003 -0400, you wrote:

On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Dwight Ringdahl wrote:
Nope strictly for marketing reasons... ASN has almost no place in BGP 
selection.

Dang Geek Pride!  (Still MH94 and 3901 after all these years..)

It's worse than hanging around Ham radio guys with 4 digit call 
signs...

.. Next we'll get into .. "I booted off of paper tape.." and then.. "I 
booted off of flip switches".. but I'm one of the few that have strung 
ferrites on a loom.. Martha.. get me my cane..

------- And to get completely off topic.. Why/how would you use
an ASN for marketing purposes? And should this even be considered..
except as a tongue in cheek geek thing? 



IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
attachments.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
prohibited.  Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or
should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or
sell any security or other financial instrument.  Neither the sender, his or
her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as
to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein
or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.



Current thread: