nanog mailing list archives
Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 23:19:59 -0600 (MDT)
http://www.nspllc.com/New%20Pages/Reliable%20IP%20Nodes.pdf Argues that by going from a dual-router POP design to a single redundant router configuration, I can reduce annual downtime costs by 93% (?) and reduce CAPEX and OPEX (seems logical). Also mentions that the single redundant router can get closer to the ever-elusive 5-9's. Anyone doing this in their network? Is there validity in the claims in this white paper? Anyone looked at the Alcatel product that apparently funded this paper? Pete.
Current thread:
- Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Pete Kruckenberg (Apr 09)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Neil J. McRae (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Peter E. Fry (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Brandon Ross (Apr 10)
- Re: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Neil J. McRae (Apr 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Dual node vs "Reliable IP" Architecture Jim Deleskie (Apr 10)