nanog mailing list archives
Re: layer 3 switch debate
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:02:50 -0400
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:54:03 BST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
Most commonly seems to be interoperability, the switches do their own job fine in their own isolated environment but they cant act as a "ISP router".. in my experience then tend to have odd bugs and behave slightly unexpectedly when say for example routing OSPF or BGP.
As opposed to enterprise-class routers, which have their own odd bugs. ;)
Altho this is probably a chicken and egg - if more people tried to use them perhaps the vendors would fix the code!
IOS 12 isn't bug-free.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Charles Sprickman (Sep 27)
- JUNO.COM Richard Irving (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)