nanog mailing list archives
Re: AP IX locations
From: "Michael C. Wu" <keichii () iteration net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:57:12 -0700
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:43:19PM -0400, Dorian Kim scribbled: | On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote: | > Above.net and AT&T are your best bets for operations based in the Americas. | > Above has a .jp IX/colo that is almost "the" best connected place in AP. | > ATT and Above.net provide almost 80 to 90% of the bandwidth from | > the Americas to AP. | | A handful of incumbent telcos of AP region countries as well as few others | operate multigigabit IP networks across the Pacific. I don't think they'd | agree with your statement. They co-own the fibre lines to the US and other places, and the upstream for the AP telcos is inevitably a U.S. large scale provider. Cheers, Michael
Current thread:
- AP IX locations Neil J. McRae (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations keichii (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Michael C. Wu (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations German Martinez (Sep 26)
- RE: AP IX locations Barry Raveendran Greene (Sep 29)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 29)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations keichii (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AP IX locations James Spenceley (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Luyer (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Conrad (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations German Martinez (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Lane Patterson (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations ren (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 26)