Re: i think terroists are going to love ipv6

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>]

RFC1925 Part 2.4

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Joe Baptista wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Segrave wrote:
>
> > > who cares.  China is not aware of the security implications to the
> > > homeland.  china is after all a nation ruled by madarines.  the colours of
> > > authority change with the wind but the rules of the mandarine class has
> > > not ended.  order is critical to the natural balance of chiness society.
> > >
> > > ipv6 challenges order.  so what will the nat wall of china do now.  i
> > > shall of course be investigating.  i think icann goes to china next ;)
> >
> > Could further nonsense in this direction please be sent to a newsgroup
> > like alt.test please?
> >
> > Nanog is hardly the place for such incisive analysis of the current
> > political order or social structures of China.
> >
> > And it's Mandarin. Capitalized even. Which suggests the depth of
> > research which has obviously gone into this.
>
> hey - the chiness are a speciality of mine ;)
>
> lynx www.dot-god.com/bod/jb/chinasponsor.html
>
> and these are issues that we are going to have to deal with.  and it's no
> picnic for the people who have to manage ipv6 infrastructure.  the chines
> are the least of our concerns.
>
> cheers
> joe baptista
>
> p.s. i still have no idea where the fantasy in my article exists.  so far
> i just see i-society complaints of madness but no substance.