nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pricing model for transit services
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:12:52 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:50:17PM -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:Also, some large ISP's have a policy that you must buy the whole pipe unmetered if your commit is >50% pipe speed.Never heard that one, but conversly most ISPs have a minimum commit for
I have, but not 50%.. usually around 75% and the way I've seen it is you pay for the 75% and that gets you the full pipe unmetered. ie the extra 25% is FOC but its not really that usable anyhow as you know.. Steve
"big expensive ports". For example, 1 meg commits on FastE ports are usually fine because almost nobody still has ports that are only 10Mbit Ethernet. But noone in their right mind will give GigE ports to 10Mbit committers, for potential abuse reasons and port cost reasons at the very least.And there are at least 4 ways of computing 95th percentile, though I'm sure there've already been threads on this.There is only one way, anyone else is computing "something else" that they just happen to bill with. But this sounds like a subject for the NANOG FAQ. :)
Current thread:
- Pricing model for transit services Olivier Bonaventure (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Alex Rubenstein (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Lane Patterson (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Joe Abley (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Lane Patterson (Sep 23)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services alex (Sep 24)
- Re: Pricing model for transit services Alex Rubenstein (Sep 23)