nanog mailing list archives
RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.
From: "Sameer R. Manek" <manek () ecst csuchico edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 22:17:24 -0700
Let's try and limit the name calling to the playground, and stick to the mailing list charter. Unless either of you two has something topical to discuss, this discussion should be taken to private email and not the mailing list. Sameer
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of sal.sabella () hushmail com Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:27 PM To: nanog () merit edu; chris () bblabs com Subject: RE: IP over in-ground cable applications.I've been called a lot of things, but moron isn't one of them.Want to make a bet on it with your boss? Moron. Sal Sabella
Current thread:
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications., (continued)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Petri Helenius (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Vinny Abello (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Sameer R. Manek (Sep 12)