nanog mailing list archives

Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.


From: "David G. Andersen" <dga () lcs mit edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:09:14 -0400


On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:04:35PM -0400, Deepak Jain mooed:


You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to
effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already
multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage.

Unless, of course, you expect cable customers to be broadcasting to other
cable customers (say their own home video content)... Then MPEG2 Multicast
would be your friend.

 I don't think the answer is as simple as that.  It really depends
on the number of subscribers per last-hop multicast box, and on
the number of channels you offer / popularity distribution of
the channels.

  If you've got 5 channels and 10,000 subscribers per box,
multicast saves you nothing.  If you've got 1000 channels and
100 subscribers per box, ...

  -Dave

-- 
work: dga () lcs mit edu                          me:  dga () pobox com
      MIT Laboratory for Computer Science           http://www.angio.net/
      I do not accept unsolicited commercial email.  Do not spam me.


Current thread: