Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:08:53PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> In some way you are right, but still I think it's even worse to use WEP 
> cause then the admins might think it's safe, it takes about 15 minutes 
> to crack a wepkey, so instead of drive-by spamming you could call it 
> drive-by, have a bagle, start spamming.

        I'm not trying to fix the underlying wireless encryption
option just provide a simple way that the manufacturers can ship
a 'more secure' out-of-the-box-product.

> The most hardware/software indipendent solution I have seen so far is 
> the use of VPN, simply place the WLAN outside your own LAN.

        Absolutely.

        There are a lot of things one can do:

        1) enable wep
        2) rotate wep keys
        3) authenticate by mac-address
        4) restrict dhcp to known mac-addresses
        5) force utilization of vpn/ipsec client

        Obviously not all of these solutions are available
in all cases, but in a home or small lan-environment a subset of
these will increase security (even if it's reinforcing the screen door
with 1/16" of balsa wood)

        - jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.