nanog mailing list archives

RE: AT&T NYC


From: "Frank Scalzo" <frank.scalzo () amerinex net>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:52:58 -0400



Since when is BGP a bug-free protocol? Let's not forget the BGP best
path selection algorithm itself is broken (there are circumstances under
which it will NEVER converge on a best path see ietf draft on IDR route
oscillation). Not to mention the various malformed AS-Path bugs which
have shown up over the years. I took a vendor class once where they made
us do a lab where we had to run BGP w/o an IGP, in a later revision of
the class they removed that lab because they decided it was too much of
a nightmare even for a lab environment.


-----Original Message-----
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch () muada com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:39 AM
To: alex () yuriev com
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: AT&T NYC


On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:

That is why their route is *nailed* via BGP to the router that
*always*
provide connectivity to them. If they have to move, BGP injectors are
your
friends. Takes seconds.

Talking about things that take seconds: would you mind sharing your BGP
hold time values with us?

Iljitsch van Beijnum


Current thread: