nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 country of origin
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:10:31 -0500
Thus spake "Ralph Doncaster" <ralph () istop com>
That's basically all Netscape & Microsoft were doing when they had to restrict 128-bit SSL. They threw in the requirement to enter your address & phone number, but they had no way of telling if you were entering your address, or the one you got from doing a four11.com lookup of John Smith in Plano, Tx.
The new crypto regulations allow shrink-wrapped software to be exported if the receiver claims to be authorized; there is no legal requirement on the exporter to actually verify this status... I really wonder if there's any point in regulating at all, if they're going to be so blatantly stupid about it. S
Current thread:
- Re: IPv4 country of origin, (continued)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Gary E. Miller (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin alex (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Stephen Sprunk (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin alex (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin dre (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv4 country of origin dgold (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin dre (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Peter Salus (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin dre (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Peter Salus (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Ralph Doncaster (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Stephen Sprunk (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Ralph Doncaster (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Stephen Sprunk (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv4 country of origin Peter Salus (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 country of origin Michael . Dillon (Oct 03)