nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:30:06 +0100 (BST)
Well Sprints non-peering policy is second to none if that helps with C&W a close second..... :) Steve On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Christopher K. Neitzert wrote:
List, Neither Sprint nor Qwest are serious about earning my business and are not providing me with their network peering details. I was hoping that the list might have the collective resources to help me determine who has better peering. thanks chirstopher
Current thread:
- Sprint VS. Qwest Christopher K. Neitzert (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Niclas Comstedt (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 19)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 22)