nanog mailing list archives
Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:16:34 -0500
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:03:14 GMT, variable () ednet co uk said:
I know that these are both legitimate IP addresses, but if they are only being used for DDoS then surely we should look at locking them down (in the same way as broadcast packets have been)?
We should look at locking them down the same way we've looked at locking down broadcast packets? Or am I incorrect, and in fact Smurf attacks have become so rare that they are once again only of theoretical interest?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? variable (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? variable (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? jlewis (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Joel Jaeggli (Nov 25)
- Message not available
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Joe Provo (Nov 26)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? variable (Nov 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? variable (Nov 25)
- Re: Odd DDoS, anyone else seen this? Stephen J. Wilcox (Nov 25)