nanog mailing list archives

Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address


From: Jim Segrave <jes () nl demon net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:26:13 +0100


On Tue 19 Nov 2002 (07:12 -0500), Johannes Ullrich wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/19/nyregion/19FUEL.html
...
While almost everyone on this list knows which building is the subject
of the article, we can discuss the issue without discussing the
particular building.

On-site fuel storage is one of those double-edge swords.  

The article is comparing the relatively 'inert' diesel fuel to
the aircraft fuel that caused the devastation at the WTC.
Did the authors of this article ever hear about heating oil tanks?

I suggest you have a closer look at what aviation fuel actually is.


-- 
Jim Segrave           jes () nl demon net


Current thread: