nanog mailing list archives
Re: CogentCo
From: "Mike (meuon) Harrison" <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:17:35 -0500 (EST)
It also appears to block Gnutella and similar protocols.You should never sign an IP access agreement that doesn't give you access to the filtering rules that affect your traffic. Ideally, you should strongly
We have not signed a thing. If I even attempted to explain the complex political fiasco that got us here, even Nanog members would be shocked. And as interested parties are on this list (I got a call already) and monitoring this discussion, I'll refrain. Theoretically, the other end of this 100mbps connection is Gig-E and is costing $20-30g/month.. we are testing it for suitability for our purposes... so far it is not making the grade. We've been spoiled by a UUnet and AT&T connection. :) For those that wanted the bad (140 lines of perl) speed check CGI, it's: http://speedy.higherbandwidth.net/speed.zip No, it's not secure or very bright.. It's a quick idiot check and is very useful, especially when it can use an suid'd MTR. And lastly, THANK YOU for all the testing, the marvelous traceroutes and data collected and the personal (mostly off-list) e-mails regarding Cogent. --Mike-- alpha/beta-testing metronetchattanooga.com
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX nstratton (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- Re: PAIX Jere Retzer (Nov 18)
- CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)
- Re: CogentCo David Schwartz (Nov 18)
- Re: CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)
- Cogent Results as a CGI Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 19)
- Re: Cogent Results as a CGI Marshall Eubanks (Nov 19)
- Re: Cogent Results as a CGI Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 19)
- CogentCo Mike (meuon) Harrison (Nov 18)