nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:37:08 -0500
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:20:36 EST, fkittred () gwi net said:
relatively cheap. I know our costs are lower and quality is higher than our competitors and I believe the reason is that we go for a simple network designed around cheap routers and fat pipes. We made
OK. I'll bite. What do you define as a "cheap" router, and just as important, what counts as a "fat" pipe where you are? You didn't choose the well-known router line from the well-known vendor(*) that handles line-speed packets, as long as you don't even whisper "ingress filtering" within it's hearing, did you? -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech (*) Yes, there's multiple answers to this one.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 24)
- Re: PAIX E.B. Dreger (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Richard Irving (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Richard Irving (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Brian (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX E.B. Dreger (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX E.B. Dreger (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Vadim Antonov (Nov 14)