nanog mailing list archives

RE: disconnected autonomous systems


From: "Kris Foster" <Kris.Foster () telus com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:11:20 -0700


Aren't some reasons for using disconnected as's regulatory 
based ie the
bells etc?


As far as I've seen they do the right thing and use multiple ASNs.

Kris


On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:


inherently wrong with using a single AS in multiple 
locations, and
advertising discrete blocks of address space in each 
one. The best reason
to do this is for a network that you eventually plan to 
merge - it
eliminates issues of having to make major BGP 
configuration changes.

Nothing inherently wrong with it if you're paying for 
transit, but good
luck getting peering in multiple locations without 
presenting consistent
views.

No problem at all. Use a tunnel.

Going back to the original question:

(A) Is there a reason have disconnected ASs? Sure. Does it 
make more sense
than using multiple AS numbers? No.

(B) Is there a reason to deaggregate? Absolutely. The 
biggest being rather
bad internal allocations practiced by networks.

Alex

--







Current thread: