nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco quality
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:54:58 -0400
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:08:08AM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
For those saying Cisco is so great, it's still fucked up pretty bad. IOS 12.1 and later doesn't allow an MTU > 1460 on L2TP, while 12.0.7(T) works fine with a 1492 MTU that my PPPoE customers expect. Every rev I've tried from 12.0 and up has problems with CEF when using ISL VLAN sub-interfaces, and without CEF, mac-accounting is screwed up.
If thats the worst Cisco bug you've got, you are the luckiest man on the face of the earth. Everyone has bugs, but Cisco has better excuses to go along with them. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Cisco quality Ralph Doncaster (May 21)
- RE: Cisco quality Robert Blayzor (May 22)
- Re: Cisco quality Richard A Steenbergen (May 22)
- Re: Cisco quality Rob Healey (May 22)
- Economics of Support Costs (was: Cisco quality) Larry Diffey (May 22)
- Re: Economics of Support Costs (was: Cisco quality) Bradley Dunn (May 22)
- Re: Cisco quality Stephen Sprunk (May 22)
- Economics of Support Costs (was: Cisco quality) Larry Diffey (May 22)