nanog mailing list archives
Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios)
From: James Smith <jsmith () PRESIDIO com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:48:25 -0400
I apologize in advance, I'm a total newbie...so what did you have to do?Build resilience into his single homed, single point of failure non-redundant network. Steve
============================================= Maybe it is possible he made a business decision based on the long term costs involved with multihoming/redundancy vs. the loss of near total reachability. He may have come to the conclusion that the probability of that scenario occuring was not sufficient reason to multihome. His call. I think we all assume that our provider "guarantees" us some sort of "total reachability". Near as I can figure, they do not. Therefore, you buy a pipe into their network based on percieved and actual connectivity and hope that the situation remains static at best. Does ANY provider give a "reachability" guarantee? James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE Systems Engineer The Presidio Corporation So I'm top posting. Sue me.
Current thread:
- Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) James Smith (May 10)
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) E.B. Dreger (May 10)
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) Mark Kent (May 10)
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) Chrisy Luke (May 10)
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) E.B. Dreger (May 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) E.B. Dreger (May 10)
- RE: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) James Smith (May 10)
- RE: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) E.B. Dreger (May 10)
- Re: Effects of de-peering... (was RE: ratios) E.B. Dreger (May 10)