nanog mailing list archives
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: "Mansey, Jon" <Jon_Mansey () verestar com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:52:31 -0700
Why do you need a public IP to do ssh? jm
-----Original Message----- From: Simon Higgs [mailto:simon () higgs com] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:44 PM To: Scott Francis Cc: Peter Bierman; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? At 01:20 AM 5/2/2002 -0700, Scott Francis wrote:The average customer buying a "web-enabled" phone doesn't need a publicly-routeable IP. I challenge anybody to demonstrate why a cell phone needs a public IP. It's a PHONE, not a server.I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My current phone does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages of analog-type services? Best Regards, Simon -- ###
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?, (continued)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? John Kristoff (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Mansey, Jon (May 02)
- Re[2]: Large ISPs doing NAT? Richard Welty (May 02)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas (May 03)