Re: Problems with a black hole list in the netherlands

[Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>]

Actually, I did... I doesn't seem too on the level.

With lines like:
> Even we don't block, we just send a 471
> reply and let the monkeys determine whether the e-mail looks legitimate or spammy. 

However, after explaining all this about 127.0.0.2, there is a little
note on the bottom:

> What does 127.0.0.4 mean?
>
> Not much, it's the only code we return, 
> "not whitelisted" is perhaps the most accurate description. 

Guess the number returned for us ?

Ironic, at least.

Were it not referenced by http://Relays.OsiruSoft.com./, 
Frankly, I would care less.

* Hint * Hint *

Lionel wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:04:36 -0500, Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello, we are currently having a problem with a vigilante block list
> > in the netherlands... I figure this is as good a forum as any....
> >
> > > The boilerplate:
> > > Please see <http://selwerd.cx/xbl/>, xbl is a *local* list, it would cost
> > > us time to check whether we can whitelist your IP.
> [...]
> > How would one approach -this-  ?
>
> I would start by reading the web page in the URL you quoted. You might
> find it illuminating.
>
> --
>    W
>  . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because
>   \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est
> ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------