nanog mailing list archives

Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering


From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:04:10 +0000 (GMT)


Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:20:02 +0000 (GMT)
From: Stephen J. Wilcox <steve () opaltelecom co uk>

On another angle, if enough people refuse to take C&W routes
from transit preferring only peering.... nar, thats a
conspiracy! Good plan tho.

But if provider X becomes undesirable, I'd expect people to
adjust local-pref on learned routes.  That reduces the amount of
traffic _to_ the provider in question, which certainly affects
symmetry.

If you _really_ want to get nasty, think frac-DS1, ^AS$ on
inbound, and ^$ on outbound. :-P

Oh, wait... except for the filter lists being a tish off, that's
how peering between certain providers used to be in the mid, even
late, 1990s. ;-)  [Stretching the truth, but certain inter-AS
hops sure made me wonder...]


Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.


Current thread: