nanog mailing list archives
Re: long distance gigabit ethernet
From: Tony Rimovsky <tony () ncsa uiuc edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:41:37 -0600
One thing to consider here is that you have to buy and OC-192 service for 10GbE WAN phy. That is prohibitively expensive for many. Also, be sure to ask Ethernet vendors about their time frames for WAN PHY support. While there is a spec for WAN PHY, there has been a disconnect between the telco and ethernet oriented industries about which PHY will make money for them the fastest. Ethernet vendors in the 10G space typically provide LAN PHY now with vauge plans for WAN phy over the next 18 months. There are exceptions already and this will resolve over time. However, if you are seriously looking at 10GigE today, this is worth spending some time on. For GbE, another direction to look at is the DWDM products that can feed two gig ethernets into an OC-48 channel. On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 10:45:12AM -0500, Bill St. Arnaud wrote:
Forget it with today's technology. All long haul systems use SONET framing. But with the 10Gbe standard WAN PHY you can directly connect into a SONET transponder and your ethernet will be carried transparently. Bill ----------------------------- Bill St. Arnaud Senior Director Network Projects CANARIE Inc www.canarie.ca/~bstarn-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Greg Pendergrass Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:36 AM To: 'Nanog@Merit. Edu' Subject: long distance gigabit ethernet I'm looking at long-haul gigabit ethernet as a possible solution versus traditional SONET and I'm a little bit wary as promises made on web pages and white papers aren't *always* completely accurate. I'd appreciate it if you all would share your experiences with it. By long-haul I mean in the hundreds or thousands of miles. I need to know: a. Does it work properly? b. Who offers it in the continental US? Please contact me off-list. Any information is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Greg Pendergrass
Current thread:
- long distance gigabit ethernet Greg Pendergrass (Mar 22)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet Bill St. Arnaud (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Tony Rimovsky (Mar 22)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet Chen Genossar (Mar 23)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet David Schwartz (Mar 24)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Tony Rimovsky (Mar 22)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet Bill St. Arnaud (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 22)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet Greg Pendergrass (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Jon Mansey (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Jared Mauch (Mar 22)
- RE: long distance gigabit ethernet Greg Pendergrass (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Antony (Mar 22)
- Re: long distance gigabit ethernet Barton F Bruce (Mar 22)