nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"?
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw () wittsend com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:56:07 -0400
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 08:25:12AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
Is funny that both ICANN and law enforcement are trying to clean up whois information to facilitate investigative capabilities.
actually, american law enforcement is seeking to make it a crime to submit false whois data.
You got a reference on that?
randy
Mike -- Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw () WittsEnd com /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"?, (continued)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Richard Forno (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Jim Mercer (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? amar (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? todd glassey (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Peter Galbavy (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? sjj (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Michael H. Warfield (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Martin Hannigan (Jun 19)
- Re: ICANN requirement for "information refreshing"? Stephen Griffin (Jun 19)